For those of us with a finger in more than one internet pie

March 26, 2014 6:07 AM

Would it be possible for the member profile page template to be changed to allow for the entry of more than one personal website? It's possible for those who have more than one internet site to link to them in the free form space further down on the page, so it's not a change of huge import, but still... it might be a nice option.
posted by orange swan to Feature Requests at 6:07 AM (68 comments total)

I wonder what percentage of us have a website listed at all? Especially for active users.
posted by Blasdelb at 6:17 AM on March 26, 2014

I don't think we're likely to make this change. Right now if you enter a personal website, it gets a very prominent place on the page. It appears as the 'website' link after the page headline '[username]'s profile'. If we move to more than one link we'd need to change that. There isn't enough room to include several website links in the top line if you take all of the various sizes that the page needs to be into consideration.

So that would mean moving the list of personal websites down into the page somewhere. Maybe folding them into the Also On list would be the best way to do it. However we list them it would take away the prominence of that feature.

In Ye Olde Time MetaFilter when Matt set up profile pages, there was kind of an assumption that you had one particular website that was your personal home for your online life. I'm not sure that assumption holds up today. I think people tend to be more scattered across the Web at various social services without a central home. So I understand the impulse to diversify, but I think we'll probably leave this feature as it is for now and let people choose what they feel is right for that spot. As you mentioned, you can always add more sites in the personal blurb area of the page.
posted by pb (staff) at 6:32 AM on March 26, 2014 [6 favorites]

You could set up a landing page somewhere on the internet that has links to all your places, and list that as your website. Kind of like this page on Jessamyn's website, the idea of which I shamelessly stole for my own website.
posted by ocherdraco at 7:23 AM on March 26, 2014 [4 favorites]

You could have an "Also On" service that was just a generic website icon (whatever that is) and then just let you put in a freeform URL. Seems like a nice compromise. Keeps the prominence of the "website" link while also allowing for multiple sites.
posted by Rock Steady at 7:29 AM on March 26, 2014

Some people link to a lot of stuff in their "about me" sections, so maybe a decent workaround is to just list everything there?
posted by LionIndex at 7:31 AM on March 26, 2014 [1 favorite]

If I was a search engine, "internet pie" would be a very powerful keyword to get indexed by me.
posted by MCMikeNamara at 7:53 AM on March 26, 2014

No epidermis off my proboscis.
posted by y2karl at 7:58 AM on March 26, 2014 [1 favorite]

One thing that would be nice would be an ability to give our "Website" a hyperlinked title with a reasonable character limit
posted by Blasdelb at 8:35 AM on March 26, 2014 [2 favorites]

Such as two.
posted by shakespeherian at 9:52 AM on March 26, 2014 [1 favorite]

In Ye Olde Time MetaFilter when Matt set up profile pages ...

YE OLDE TIME METAFILTRE

For thofe among us with multiple and various interefts too divers to be herein enumerated.
March 26, 1714 -- Sundial at Eighth Position -- Write under

I fay! Would it be poffible for the roll of members of thif auguft infitution to to be altered in particular refects, so af to allow for the notation of more than one gentlemans' club by each chap's name?
Promulgated by Lord Swan d'Orange to Members' Requests at the aforementioned time (2 epistles) [call a notary] [raise a point of order]

Feconded!
Promulgated by the Earl Blasdelb shortly thereafter [call a notary] [raise a point of order]

Forry chaps - we're all out of ink, blaft it.
Promulgated by Sir P.B. shortly thereafter [call a notary] [raise a point of order]
posted by the quidnunc kid at 10:00 AM on March 26, 2014 [134 favorites]

One thing that would be nice would be an ability to give our "Website" a hyperlinked title with a reasonable character limit

Such as two.

2 or it wouldn't fit.
posted by ersatz at 10:03 AM on March 26, 2014

I waf told an affortment of hearty pief would be provided.

Promulgated by the Baron Rock of Fteady after fome delay [thrice notated] [raise a point of order]
posted by Rock Steady at 10:14 AM on March 26, 2014 [14 favorites]

You could set up a landing page somewhere on the internet that has links to all your places, and list that as your website. Kind of like this page on Jessamyn's website

Why are we still talking about this silly profile field when we should be talking about the fact that jessamyn has this awesome Donald Barthelme page?
posted by brundlefly at 10:14 AM on March 26, 2014 [3 favorites]

to allow for the entry of more than one personal website?

What madness is this?
posted by blue_beetle at 10:17 AM on March 26, 2014 [1 favorite]

An ſ is not an f!
posted by shakespeherian at 10:23 AM on March 26, 2014 [21 favorites]

I knew fomebody was going to say that.
posted by MCMikeNamara at 10:29 AM on March 26, 2014 [7 favorites]

I muft requeft that the "play-wright" that we have recently admitted to the Metafiltre, againft my ftrong objectionf, ftop being fuch a humourleff pedant.

Promulgated by the Baron Rock of Fteady &c.
posted by Rock Steady at 10:30 AM on March 26, 2014 [9 favorites]

I voted #1 for Marlowe, perfonally.
Promulgated by quidnunc, Marquis of kid, Michaelmas term [summon an equerry] [petition his Majesty-in-council]
posted by the quidnunc kid at 10:38 AM on March 26, 2014 [13 favorites]

Also the long s never goes on the end of a word and also my username is not a reference to Shakespeare.
posted by shakespeherian at 10:38 AM on March 26, 2014 [10 favorites]

Also the long s never goes on the end of a word and also my username is not a reference to Shakespeare.

Where in the name of all that is holy is your comma between those two clauses?!

And to be thoroughly pedantic, isn't your name not in complete fact a TS Eliot reference, but in truth an Irving Berlin reference?!

And where were you the night of August the 13th?!
posted by Celsius1414 at 10:52 AM on March 26, 2014 [1 favorite]

my username is not a reference to Shakespeare

Good thing too - your Henry IV Part 12 was bloody awful. Ftop milking the franchife!
posted by the quidnunc kid at 11:04 AM on March 26, 2014 [11 favorites]

[worry a street-urchin] [implore Sir Robert Peel]
posted by the quidnunc kid at 11:07 AM on March 26, 2014 [7 favorites]

[purchase an indulgence] [off with their heads]
posted by Rock Steady at 11:39 AM on March 26, 2014 [2 favorites]

[jiggle a dowager] [profit-à-prendre]
posted by the quidnunc kid at 11:59 AM on March 26, 2014 [5 favorites]

As this our site Metafiltre (being, if not a material locus, like unto a Coffee-Shoppe or a Tennis-Court, yet still a site indeed, as proper a place for the exchange of badinage and chimeræ of mind, as the shoppe is to the inky drink, or the court to volleys of balls); as this our site Metafiltre, I say, rides van afore the common soldiery of the lesser gazettes, I humbly petition your honors that we adopt en masse the novel s miniscule so newly expounded by the most fashionable printers of London and the Continent.
Promulgated by le Comte d'Iridique this Vendre-Day at the 14th Bell [confer letter of patent] [invoke the Code Duello ]
posted by Iridic at 12:09 PM on March 26, 2014 [22 favorites]

Whilſt le Comte d'Iridique was delighting in the company of the ſoi-diſant "faſhionable" printers, ――and doubtleſs quaffing ſuch bibulous Subſtances as are commonly to be found in the Vicinity of ſuch perſons――he ſeems to have become enamoured (I ſhall not venture to ſuggeſt his Reaſons) of the s minuſcule――or, as he prefers to denominate it, the "s miniscule", ――which would do naught but increaſe the profits of ſome few while deſtroying the traditions of this great Site, to which I venture to ſuggeſt none but a Jacobin could give aſsent. If le Comte d'Iridique wiſhes to diſpute this Suggeſtion, or to accept a leſson in the uſe of the Scymetar――he knows where I am to be found.

Promulgated by Chapeau de Langue, Bart., ſhortly thereafter [picqet a foe] [invoke a letter of marque and repriſal]
posted by languagehat at 12:46 PM on March 26, 2014 [36 favorites]

Come come my Lords, it's not the size of one's "s" that counts, it's what one does with it. Or so Molly the Gin-Lane Tart tells me! Ho Ho-oh wait a moment I appear to have contracted syphilis. Bugger.
posted by the quidnunc kid at 12:52 PM on March 26, 2014 [16 favorites]

(This thread hits the ideal sweet spot in my sense of humor between silly, smart, and stupid. Much thanks.)
posted by MCMikeNamara at 12:54 PM on March 26, 2014 [13 favorites]

Dswounds! Monsieur Chapeau, I make no doubt that your late intimations of Intemperacy were committed in that state named――that state redoubled, I aver, for did they not dribble rashly from the crooked pen of a sot? For your piece of Impudence, I return my illimited Malison; for your so-idle Threat, my dire Intent. Though you go armored, cap-a-pie, to the engagement, I shall meet you in my shirt, and restore your words to your teeth on the point of the poignard.

Not this night or next, though, for I suffer rather from a Catarrh. If you can truly claim the honor attendant to the de, then you will wait until I may claim my Satisfaction en bonne forme.
Promulgated by le Comte d'Iridique, &c. [cough up bloody sputum] [expire]
posted by Iridic at 1:37 PM on March 26, 2014 [7 favorites]

It's a claßy-aß letter!
posted by moonmilk at 2:01 PM on March 26, 2014 [8 favorites]

...I mean le⫪er.
posted by moonmilk at 2:16 PM on March 26, 2014

I wish we could bring back the letter thorn, aka þorn. Þhere is someþing really spiffy about þe "th" sound being its own þing. Þuffering þuccotash!
posted by Celsius1414 at 2:22 PM on March 26, 2014

And if þere happened to be a documentary made about þorn, it could be called "Þornography".

It has an ascender and a descender!
posted by Celsius1414 at 2:26 PM on March 26, 2014 [6 favorites]

I like the letter psi because I like chiψ and naψ.
posted by moonmilk at 2:27 PM on March 26, 2014 [1 favorite]

What is that called when you make a link to jump to another part of the page? You could make a link like that in the website field to jump down to a list of websites in the freeform section, yeah?
posted by maggieb at 2:42 PM on March 26, 2014

[C'est une très bonne] [C'est une très mauvaise]
posted by double block and bleed at 2:55 PM on March 26, 2014 [1 favorite]

maggieb: that's known as an anchor, of which your ubiquitous href navigation link is a special instance
posted by idiopath at 3:00 PM on March 26, 2014

quidnunc, Marquis of kid
I'm sure you know best, but I've been spending the last hour pondering whether it wasn't really supposed to be
Votez à numéro 1 Kid de Quidnunque.
posted by Namlit at 3:01 PM on March 26, 2014

10 U.S. Code § 914 - Art. 114. Dueling

Any person subject to this chapter who fights or promotes, or is concerned in or connives at fighting a duel, or who, having knowledge of a challenge sent or about to be sent, fails to report the facts promptly to the proper authority, shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
posted by double block and bleed at 3:02 PM on March 26, 2014

make that "june direct". There are birthdays to be celebrated in May.
posted by Namlit at 3:03 PM on March 26, 2014

Code Duello

Rule 1. The first offense requires the first apology, though the retort may have been more offensive than the insult. Example: A tells B he is impertinent, etc. B retorts that he lies; yet A must make the first apology because he gave the first offense, and then (after one fire) B may explain away the retort by a subsequent apology.

Rule 2. But if the parties would rather fight on, then after two shots each (but in no case before), B may explain first, and A apologize afterward.

N.B. The above rules apply to all cases of offenses in retort not of stronger class than the example.

Rule 3. If a doubt exist who gave the first offense, the decision rests with the seconds; if they won't decide, or can't agree, the matter must proceed to two shots, or to a hit, if the challenger require it.

Rule 4. When the lie direct is the first offense, the aggressor must either beg pardon in express terms; exchange two shots previous to apology; or three shots followed up by explanation; or fire on till a severe hit be received by one party or the other.

Rule 5. As a blow is strictly prohibited under any circumstances among gentlemen, no verbal apology can be received for such an insult. The alternatives, therefore -- the offender handing a cane to the injured party, to be used on his own back, at the same time begging pardon; firing on until one or both are disabled; or exchanging three shots, and then asking pardon without proffer of the cane.

If swords are used, the parties engage until one is well blooded, disabled, or disarmed; or until, after receiving a wound, and blood being drawn, the aggressor begs pardon.

N.B. A disarm is considered the same as a disable. The disarmer may (strictly) break his adversary's sword; but if it be the challenger who is disarmed, it is considered as ungenerous to do so.

In the case the challenged be disarmed and refuses to ask pardon or atone, he must not be killed, as formerly; but the challenger may lay his own sword on the aggressor's shoulder, then break the aggressor's sword and say, "I spare your life!" The challenged can never revive the quarrel -- the challenger may.

Rule 6. If A gives B the lie, and B retorts by a blow (being the two greatest offenses), no reconciliation can take place till after two discharges each, or a severe hit; after which B may beg A's pardon humbly for the blow and then A may explain simply for the lie; because a blow is never allowable, and the offense of the lie, therefore, merges in it. (See preceding rules.)

N.B. Challenges for undivulged causes may be reconciled on the ground, after one shot. An explanation or the slightest hit should be sufficient in such cases, because no personal offense transpired.

Rule 7. But no apology can be received, in any case, after the parties have actually taken ground, without exchange of fires.

Rule 8. In the above case, no challenger is obliged to divulge his cause of challenge (if private) unless required by the challenged so to do before their meeting.

Rule 9. All imputations of cheating at play, races, etc., to be considered equivalent to a blow; but may be reconciled after one shot, on admitting their falsehood and begging pardon publicly.

Rule 10. Any insult to a lady under a gentleman's care or protection to be considered as, by one degree, a greater offense than if given to the gentleman personally, and to be regulated accordingly.

Rule 11. Offenses originating or accruing from the support of ladies' reputations, to be considered as less unjustifiable than any others of the same class, and as admitting of slighter apologies by the aggressor: this to be determined by the circumstances of the case, but always favorable to the lady.

Rule 12. In simple, unpremeditated recontres with the smallsword, or couteau de chasse, the rule is -- first draw, first sheath, unless blood is drawn; then both sheath, and proceed to investigation.

Rule 13. No dumb shooting or firing in the air is admissible in any case. The challenger ought not to have challenged without receiving offense; and the challenged ought, if he gave offense, to have made an apology before he came on the ground; therefore, children's play must be dishonorable on one side or the other, and is accordingly prohibited.

Rule 14. Seconds to be of equal rank in society with the principals they attend, inasmuch as a second may either choose or chance to become a principal, and equality is indispensible.

Rule 15. Challenges are never to be delivered at night, unless the party to be challenged intend leaving the place of offense before morning; for it is desirable to avoid all hot-headed proceedings.

Rule 16. The challenged has the right to choose his own weapon, unless the challenger gives his honor he is no swordsman; after which, however, he can decline any second species of weapon proposed by the challenged.

Rule 17. The challenged chooses his ground; the challenger chooses his distance; the seconds fix the time and terms of firing.

Rule 18. The seconds load in presence of each other, unless they give their mutual honors they have charged smooth and single, which should be held sufficient.

Rule 19. Firing may be regulated -- first by signal; secondly, by word of command; or thirdly, at pleasure -- as may be agreeable to the parties. In the latter case, the parties may fire at their reasonable leisure, but second presents and rests are strictly prohibited.

Rule 20. In all cases a miss-fire is equivalent to a shot, and a snap or non-cock is to be considered as a miss-fire.

Rule 21. Seconds are bound to attempt a reconciliation before the meeting takes place, or after sufficient firing or hits, as specified.

Rule 22. Any wound sufficient to agitate the nerves and necessarily make the hand shake, must end the business for that day.

Rule 23. If the cause of the meeting be of such a nature that no apology or explanation can or will be received, the challenged takes his ground, and calls on the challenger to proceed as he chooses; in such cases, firing at pleasure is the usual practice, but may be varied by agreement.

Rule 24. In slight cases, the second hands his principal but one pistol; but in gross cases, two, holding another case ready charged in reserve.

Rule 25. Where seconds disagree, and resolve to exchange shots themselves, it must be at the same time and at right angles with their principals, thus:

If with swords, side by side, with five paces interval.

N.B. All matters and doubts not herein mentioned will be explained and cleared up by application to the committee, who meet alternately at Clonmel and Galway, at the quarter sessions, for that purpose.
posted by double block and bleed at 3:10 PM on March 26, 2014 [6 favorites]

Double block and bleed, those aren't the rules I'm familiar with.

THE CONSTITUTION OF THE FRATERNITY OF DUELING

THIS BROTHERHOOD, UNITED IN PURPOSE AND INTENT, DECREE AS FOLLOWS:

1. Members of this august institution shall not speak of it, not to any gentleman be he not a member.

2. Members of this august institution SHALL NOT speak of it, not to any gentleman be he not a member.

3. Should a fellow brother ejaculate 'PRAY THEE, SIRRAH, STOP; I BEG THY MERCY AND CRY THY PARDON', be knocked senseless, or signal with the waving of his hand, the duel must be considered completed and one must cease his pugilism.

4. Only two members may duel before the united brotherhood.

5. Only one duel may be fought before united brotherhood at any single moment.

6. Duelists must divest themselves of their tunics, their blouses, and their boots.

7. Duelists will continue, through they duel through the night 'til the very sun crests the horizon and heralds a new day, if the occasion dictates.

8. If thou ist a newly pledged brother of this hallowed brotherhood, though thy heart may pound in the hollows of thy chest and thy mouth be dry with the very thought, gird thy loins and steel thy will, sirrah. Thou MUST duel.

No other decree follows.

SO SAY THE BROTHERS OF FRATERNITY OF DUELING.
posted by His thoughts were red thoughts at 4:09 PM on March 26, 2014 [13 favorites]

[Alas, this brother sucks at proofreading.]
posted by His thoughts were red thoughts at 4:37 PM on March 26, 2014

Stuff like this is why I love MetaFilter. You people really are the best.
posted by misozaki at 4:46 PM on March 26, 2014 [1 favorite]

eh, we're ok.
posted by jonmc at 5:05 PM on March 26, 2014 [1 favorite]

eh, we're ok.

Pistols at dawn, sirrah!
posted by Rock Steady at 5:13 PM on March 26, 2014 [1 favorite]

This post just made me realize that my profile still linked to my 'blog' thing, rather than my PORTAL TO WONDERCHICKEN INDUSTRIES thing, so I have fixed that. Thanks!
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 5:28 PM on March 26, 2014

A "website"? Is that like having a facebook?
posted by George_Spiggott at 5:48 PM on March 26, 2014 [1 favorite]

Couldn't you just link to your other website on your one website? PROBLEM SOLVED
posted by oceanjesse at 5:51 PM on March 26, 2014 [1 favorite]

OMG. Stavrosthewonderchicken, I just saw your user name. Based on that information alone and no other, you might need to look at this
posted by bunderful at 6:40 PM on March 26, 2014

I so very much want a greasemonkey script now to convert the attribution lines to quidnunc's "Old Time" format.
posted by namewithoutwords at 5:12 AM on March 27, 2014 [1 favorite]

𝔗𝔥𝔢𝔯𝔢 𝔞𝔦𝔫'𝔱 𝔫𝔬 𝔬𝔩𝔡-𝔱𝔦𝔪𝔢 𝔴𝔯𝔦𝔱𝔦𝔫𝔤 𝔩𝔦𝔨𝔢 𝔅𝔩𝔞𝔠𝔨𝔩𝔢𝔱𝔱𝔢𝔯 𝔬𝔩𝔡-𝔱𝔦𝔪𝔢 𝔴𝔯𝔦𝔱𝔦𝔫𝔤.
posted by ZsigE at 6:07 AM on March 27, 2014 [9 favorites]

𝔚𝔥𝔶 𝔡𝔦𝔡𝔫'𝔱 𝔶𝔬𝔲 𝔱𝔢𝔩𝔩 𝔪𝔢 𝔱𝔥𝔦𝔰 𝔟𝔢𝔣𝔬𝔯𝔢? 𝔅𝔩𝔞𝔠𝔨𝔩𝔢𝔱𝔱𝔢𝔯 𝔦𝔰 𝔥𝔬𝔴 ℑ 𝔣𝔢𝔢𝔩 𝔦𝔫𝔰𝔦𝔡𝔢. 𝔄𝔩𝔩 𝔱𝔥𝔢 𝔱𝔦𝔪𝔢.
posted by Rock Steady at 6:16 AM on March 27, 2014 [4 favorites]

My website is tables. TABLES!!
posted by Devils Rancher at 8:07 AM on March 27, 2014 [4 favorites]

An ſ is not an f!
A sigh is not a sigh,
The fundamental things (don't) apply...
posted by yoink at 8:34 AM on March 27, 2014 [2 favorites]

𝔚𝔥𝔞𝔱 𝔥𝔞𝔱𝔥 𝔊𝔬𝔡 𝔴𝔯𝔬𝔲𝔤𝔥𝔱?
posted by Iridic at 9:07 AM on March 27, 2014 [5 favorites]

Iridic: 𝔚𝔥𝔞𝔱 𝔥𝔞𝔱𝔥 𝔊𝔬𝔡 𝔴𝔯𝔬𝔲𝔤𝔥𝔱?

Fascinating. I had no idea that Unicode includes a complete set of blackletter characters, which are supposed to be used to represent mathematical symbols in old documents, and blackletter characters are be searchable using normal tools.
posted by filthy light thief at 12:01 PM on March 27, 2014 [2 favorites]

Example of search queries on MetaFilter: what hath god wrought? and 𝔚𝔥𝔞𝔱 𝔥𝔞𝔱𝔥 𝔊𝔬𝔡 𝔴𝔯𝔬𝔲𝔤𝔥𝔱? (or, in unicode: %F0%9D%94%9A%F0%9D%94%A5%F0%9D%94%9E%F0%9D%94%B1+%F0%9D%94%A5%F0%9D%94%9E%F0%9D%94%B1%F0%9D%94%A5+%F0%9D%94%8A%F0%9D%94%AC%F0%9D%94%A1+%F0%9D%94%B4%F0%9D%94%AF%F0%9D%94%AC%F0%9D%94%B2%F0%9D%94%A4%F0%9D%94%A5%F0%9D%94%B1%3F)
posted by filthy light thief at 2:20 PM on March 27, 2014

𝔚𝔥𝔞𝔱 𝔰𝔬𝔯𝔠𝔢𝔯𝔶 𝔦𝔰 𝔱𝔥𝔦𝔰?!

I should have put the Duel Club rules in Blackletter. Le sigh.
posted by His thoughts were red thoughts at 4:40 PM on March 27, 2014

𝔗𝔯𝔢𝔞𝔱𝔶 𝔬𝔣 𝔚𝔢𝔰𝔱𝔭𝔥𝔞𝔩𝔦𝔞

𝔓𝔢𝔞𝔠𝔢 𝔗𝔯𝔢𝔞𝔱𝔶 𝔟𝔢𝔱𝔴𝔢𝔢𝔫 𝔱𝔥𝔢 ℌ𝔬𝔩𝔶 ℜ𝔬𝔪𝔞𝔫 𝔈𝔪𝔭𝔢𝔯𝔬𝔯 𝔞𝔫𝔡
𝔱𝔥𝔢 𝔎𝔦𝔫𝔤 𝔬𝔣 𝔉𝔯𝔞𝔫𝔠𝔢 𝔞𝔫𝔡 𝔱𝔥𝔢𝔦𝔯 𝔯𝔢𝔰𝔭𝔢𝔠𝔱𝔦𝔳𝔢 𝔄𝔩𝔩𝔦𝔢𝔰.

ℑ𝔫 𝔱𝔥𝔢 𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔢 𝔬𝔣 𝔱𝔥𝔢 𝔪𝔬𝔰𝔱 𝔥𝔬𝔩𝔶 𝔞𝔫𝔡 𝔦𝔫𝔡𝔦𝔳𝔦𝔡𝔲𝔞𝔩 𝔗𝔯𝔦𝔫𝔦𝔱𝔶: 𝔅𝔢 𝔦𝔱 𝔨𝔫𝔬𝔴𝔫 𝔱𝔬 𝔞𝔩𝔩, 𝔞𝔫𝔡 𝔢𝔳𝔢𝔯𝔶 𝔬𝔫𝔢 𝔴𝔥𝔬𝔪 𝔦𝔱 𝔪𝔞𝔶 𝔠𝔬𝔫𝔠𝔢𝔯𝔫, 𝔬𝔯 𝔱𝔬 𝔴𝔥𝔬𝔪 𝔦𝔫 𝔞𝔫𝔶 𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫𝔢𝔯 𝔦𝔱 𝔪𝔞𝔶 𝔟𝔢𝔩𝔬𝔫𝔤, 𝔗𝔥𝔞𝔱 𝔣𝔬𝔯 𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔶 𝔜𝔢𝔞𝔯𝔰 𝔭𝔞𝔰𝔱, 𝔇𝔦𝔰𝔠𝔬𝔯𝔡𝔰 𝔞𝔫𝔡 ℭ𝔦𝔳𝔦𝔩 𝔇𝔦𝔳𝔦𝔰𝔦𝔬𝔫𝔰 𝔟𝔢𝔦𝔫𝔤 𝔰𝔱𝔦𝔯'𝔡 𝔲𝔭 𝔦𝔫 𝔱𝔥𝔢 ℜ𝔬𝔪𝔞𝔫 𝔈𝔪𝔭𝔦𝔯𝔢, 𝔴𝔥𝔦𝔠𝔥 𝔦𝔫𝔠𝔯𝔢𝔞𝔰'𝔡 𝔱𝔬 𝔰𝔲𝔠𝔥 𝔞 𝔡𝔢𝔤𝔯𝔢𝔢, 𝔱𝔥𝔞𝔱 𝔫𝔬𝔱 𝔬𝔫𝔩𝔶 𝔞𝔩𝔩 𝔊𝔢𝔯𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔶...

I believe you're all familiar with the rest.
posted by Treaty of Westphalia at 4:48 PM on March 27, 2014 [2 favorites]

🅷🅾🆆 🅻🅾🅽🅶 🅳🅾 🆈🅾🆄 🆃🅷🅸🅽🅺 🅸🆃 🆆🅸🅻🅻 🅱🅴 🅱🅴🅵🅾🆁🅴 🅿🅱 🅵🅸🅻🆃🅴🆁🆂 🅾🅱🆂🅲🆄🆁🅴 🆄🅽🅸🅲🅾🅳🅴?
posted by double block and bleed at 4:55 PM on March 27, 2014

𝕋𝕙𝕒𝕥 𝕨𝕚𝕝𝕝 𝕓𝕖 𝕒 𝕤𝕒𝕕 𝕕𝕒𝕪, 𝕚𝕟𝕕𝕖𝕖𝕕.
posted by double block and bleed at 4:58 PM on March 27, 2014

When you get one link, use it to get more links. That way you get infinite links!
posted by michaelh at 5:29 PM on March 27, 2014

Le sigh.

ಠ_ಠ
posted by Celsius1414 at 8:46 PM on March 27, 2014

🅷🅾🆆 🅻🅾🅽🅶 🅳🅾 🆈🅾🆄 🆃🅷🅸🅽🅺 🅸🆃 🆆🅸🅻🅻 🅱🅴 🅱🅴🅵🅾🆁🅴 🅿🅱 🅵🅸🅻🆃🅴🆁🆂 🅾🅱🆂🅲🆄🆁🅴 🆄🅽🅸🅲🅾🅳🅴?

Um...New Baby Buggy?
posted by misha at 9:49 PM on March 27, 2014 [3 favorites]

Le sigh.

ಠ_ಠ

Le sorry?

Kidding, kidding! I'm sorry. Really. Put down the axe! Nooooo-[THUNK]
posted by His thoughts were red thoughts at 9:50 PM on March 27, 2014 [1 favorite]

[Quip Modest] [Reply Churlish] [Reproof Valiant]
posted by jquinby at 5:46 AM on March 31, 2014

This shit is gonna confuse the hell out of the Infodump.
posted by cortex (staff) at 9:45 AM on March 31, 2014 [7 favorites]