[less inside] August 7, 2007 8:53 AM Subscribe
On this question, brownpau claims that there is information missing from the original question. However, it's just that the words "[more inside]" are not displayed in the question's page. I've noticed this a few other times; a turn of the phrase that is meant to end in the [more inside] looks out of whack and, until I realize that it's happened again, appears to be have something missing.
Should [more inside] perhaps be placed inside the thread, as well, to lessen confusion, even though, technically, we're already inside?
Yup. Grouse nailed it.
posted by It's Raining Florence Henderson at 8:58 AM on August 7, 2007
posted by It's Raining Florence Henderson at 8:58 AM on August 7, 2007
No, we remove those jokes when people put them in. It makes questions read funny in exactly the way you outlined.
posted by jessamyn (staff) at 8:58 AM on August 7, 2007
posted by jessamyn (staff) at 8:58 AM on August 7, 2007
On the other hand, brownpau shouldn't have snarked about in the thread either. And now, everything is fixed.
posted by cortex (staff) at 9:02 AM on August 7, 2007
posted by cortex (staff) at 9:02 AM on August 7, 2007
I have something to say about this. As usual, there is
posted by brownpau at 9:03 AM on August 7, 2007 [8 favorites]
posted by brownpau at 9:03 AM on August 7, 2007 [8 favorites]
(And it's come up a few time before. See also: 1, 2, 3.)
posted by cortex (staff) at 9:05 AM on August 7, 2007
posted by cortex (staff) at 9:05 AM on August 7, 2007
This thread is closed to new comments.
posted by grouse at 8:57 AM on August 7, 2007 [9 favorites]